Singer Alexander Malinin lost the court to his former wife Olga Zarubina and the publication of the Interlocutor. Malinin did not like the interview, in which the ex-spouse spoke about Malinin’s bad attitude towards her daughter.
Alexander Malinin is married to a third marriage. Olga Zarubina - his second wife. The couple was married from 1983 to 1985, in 1986, Zarubina had a daughter, Cyrus Evdokimov.
Alexander Malinin, Olga Zarubina and Kira Evdokimova
In 1991, she and her daughter emigrated to the United States. All 25 years, the second husband Zarubina Vladimir Evdokimov was engaged in raising a child. In the early 2010s, Zarubina told that Malinin is the true father of her daughter.
In an interview with the Interlocutor, Zarubina told that in order to confirm her paternity, Kira had to undergo a DNA test. On the part of the Malinins, the father of the romance singer Nikolay Stepanovich agreed to the study. The test confirmed the paternity of Alexander Malinin.Now the controversial material has been removed from the site of the publication, but it can be found in reprints on other resources, for example, on the site “SMIonline».
Wedding of Alexander Malinin and Olga Zarubina
“I personally do not need any money from him. I myself earn good money and do not need anything. I have enough concerts and performances. After I returned to Russia, I bought an apartment in which I had just recently finished repairs. I'm all good. But alimony is the father’s money that he pays for the upbringing and maintenance of the child. This is another story. For all these years Malinin did not give me a penny. Maybe now it's time to do it? ”- said, in particular, Zarubina.
The executor did not like the interview of the ex-wife and he went to court.
Malinin considered that his honor, dignity and business reputation were hurt, and moral suffering was inflicted on him.
The lawsuit was based on several phrases: “the singer of romances does not hurry to build relations with his own daughter,” “when there is a conversation about parents and abandoned children, in principle, any adequate person will take our side”, “and he considers himself a believer, goes to church . He needs to relieve his soul, ”and others only 5 passages.
“The court rightly considered that there are facts and information that can be brought under Article 152 of the Civil Code, which protects the honor, dignity and business reputation of a citizen. And there are - as in our case - subjective judgments and evaluative opinions, which are not subject to judicial protection. For this you can draw if they are expressed in an offensive form.